Message board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 1 member: TABLE SETTER 11; 59 anonymousDiscussion: louisville outlaw
| Posted | Discussion |
| Nov. 13, 2013 ABLXTRA 6 posts | louisville outlaw new to senior ball this year , is the Louisville outlaw legal? the rule states any bat marked exceeds 1.21 is illegal . this bat is marked exceeds 1.20, so is it legal? |
| Nov. 13, 2013 ABLXTRA 6 posts | this would be the TPS SB-1 |
| Nov. 15, 2013 Wes Men's 65 335 posts | 1.20 is the old number before they set up a new test it is legal---the new tested bats have 1.21 |
| Nov. 15, 2013 taits Men's 65 4548 posts | When it came out it was illegal, that was years ago, Standards changed to 1.21 but "Exceeds 1.20" does not say where or how far it exceeds or if over the 1.21 as standard is now. You may need for check and et in writing from TD's and ASSNS about it... I had one years ago and it was a good bat. Might check ASA site since they are the ones who started the whole mess, and some others that take the time to post legal and illegal bats. |
| Nov. 16, 2013 titanhd Men's 60 638 posts | Taits. I think that he is asking if the bat is legal for Senior Softball use. ASA would have no bearing. To that point I would say that it is. The only bats that I know that we as Seniors cannot use are the Original Ultra and the BOOMBAH Cannon. If I remember correctly the Outlaw is an Aluminum bat ? Hard to believe that it would be hotter than a Reebok or Ultra II. jmo |
| Nov. 16, 2013 taits Men's 65 4548 posts | That was my point, it gives no indication of how far it exceeds 1.20 so he needs to check as stated. Personally think it would be ok but there are those that would or could use it's use as an excuse to ban him for doing so. What ever, get it in writing. Maybe even better get letter from Louisville on specs. etc. They should know. |
