Online now: 0 members ; 6 anonymous
Discussion: Understanding tie-breakers
|Nov. 10, 2009|
In looking at some of the tie-breakers, I am confused. Look at the 60-AAA in Phoenix. Twelve teams finished 1-1 in seeding play, along with 3 teams that were 2-0. Syracuse got the #4 seed (one of the many 1-1 teams), even though 4 other teams gave up fewer runs (they were all 1-1).
Is this right?
|Nov. 11, 2009|
|I'll make it easy:|
|Nov. 11, 2009|
|I'll make it even easier than that ... It was simply a Director's math error affecting 5 teams, NONE of whom noticed the errors at the time ... Seedings were correct for 13 teams and incorrect for 5, as follows:|
#4 Syracuse Cyclones - Correctly: #9
#5 Tanel 360/Bud Light - Correctly: #4
#7 Marauders - Correctly: #5
#8 Jersey Masters - Correctly: #7
#9 Tequila All Stars - Correctly: #8
In a FULL Round Robin, or at least a full round robin among the teams with the same record, the head to head record determines the higher seeds. Not applicable here with 12 tied teams. Second criteria is LEAST runs allowed in all seeding games. Third criteria is NET run differential over all games. Two ties were broken using this criteria in Phoenix. Last method is coin toss.
Mistakes happen, and sometimes even go unnoticed for a month. Thanks for pointing it out.
to reply or add to a discussion or post your own message and start a new discussion. If you don't have a message board account, please register for a free nickname
. It will only take a moment.
Phone: (916) 326-5303
Fax: (916) 326-5304
2701 K Street, Suite 101A
Sacramento, CA 95816
Send us e-mail
is dedicated to informing and uniting the Senior Softball Players of America and the World. Senior Softball-USA
sanctions tournaments and championships, registers players, writes the rulebook, publishes Senior Softball-USA News, hosts International Softball Tours and promotes Senior Softball throughout the world. More than 1.5 million men and women over 40 play Senior Softball in the United States today.