Message board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 0 members ; 71 anonymousDiscussion: TOC Major Plus
Posted | Discussion |
Feb. 14, 2010 turn2 489 posts | TOC Major Plus Does anybody know the results from Florida Miken and the N.Y. Statesmen in the 60 major plus or hoe the 55 major plus is going? Thanks, Donnie Turn Two |
Feb. 14, 2010 BruceinGa Men's 70 3233 posts | donnie, our first was close with us winning. the second was not so close and it was evidant that NY hadn't had nice weather to get in shape. Quite a few bats were broken, mine included. |
Feb. 14, 2010 taits Men's 65 4548 posts | BruceinGa, I mentioned some time back someplace about the cold balls and bats there would be many broken or crack ones. Chances are some weren't even noticed yet either. Bat warmers would have helped a little, but the hard balls were their doom. |
Feb. 14, 2010 turn2 489 posts | Bruce, Congrats on the win. Where are you guys plan on going this year? Drop me a line. Thanks, Donnie |
Feb. 15, 2010 turn2 489 posts | Does anybodt know the results of the 50/55 major plus division? Thanks, Donnie |
Feb. 15, 2010 DaveDowell Men's 70 4296 posts | 50/55-MAJOR PLUS 1. East Bay Oldies 50's (wins 50-M+) 2. Southern Slam (wins 55-M+) 3. Minnesota Grayhounds / Miken / Tanel 4. Travelodge 55's |
Feb. 15, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | One Major-plus 50 team? That's a heck of a division we have! |
Feb. 15, 2010 JamesLG 420 posts | Jawood: That is an issue that needs to be changed sooner and not later. James |
Feb. 16, 2010 turn2 489 posts | Dave, Thanks for the update and quick response. Donnie |
Feb. 16, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | JamesLG - You would think, but here we are at the start of another season with SIX major-plus teams on the west coast and 19 total. |
Feb. 16, 2010 Omar Khayyam 1357 posts | Even the effort to push more AAA teams into the major category (and push a few majors to Major+) seems confused at present. Note that in the 70 AAA category, the Nor-Cal Renegades came in second, even though SSUSA has them rated as a major team (and this before their significant upgrade in talent over the winter). Major teams being allowed to drop down; only 19 major+ in the country in 50s. Who has the solution? |
Feb. 16, 2010 salio2k Men's 60 547 posts | Omar K.....I believe the Nor-Cal Renegades were only AAA when they qualified for the TOC. That is why they played as AAA. |
Feb. 16, 2010 Omar Khayyam 1357 posts | Thanks, Sal. You're probably right. The SSUSA date for last ranking was in October. Guess I thought you played where your team was ranked before the TOC, not what it was earlier in the year with a potentially weaker team. |
Feb. 16, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | The solution is just drop the Major-plus division. All they need to do is put a small handicap on the teams they think are a little bit stronger and go play. The remaining Major-plus teams without the Mavericks around are not that much better than most Major teams, if at all. |
Feb. 17, 2010 curveball Men's 65 705 posts | Jawood, in most cases, there is a talent difference between Major and Major+, that's why the difference in ratings. If you want to keep the competition even and have more teams in the elite division, make your age group larger for the Major+ guys. Go to 30-58, 59-65. At least you would'nt be penalizing the Major guys. And, as far as "without the Mavericks around" you'd better check your sources again, I think they are still a team, and the one to beat at that. |
Feb. 17, 2010 DoubleL10 Men's 70 905 posts | curveball, Mike Adair who played for the Mavericks posted a note on this forum back in December stating that after 17 years, the Mavericks were disbanding. He had received a letter from Ken Lipinski, their Manager, to that effect. Please advise if something has changed. |
Feb. 17, 2010 diehard Men's 55 246 posts | If that is true about the Mavericks, then 2 of the top 50 major plus teams, Damons being the other one, in this country over the past 10 years or so, have decided to call it quits. That's a shame! |
Feb. 17, 2010 Easy E Men's 60 46 posts | Just to let everyone know. The Mavericks are playing this weekend in a tourney in So Cal. They still have a team, just some of the guys that played on last years team won't be playing. Hope this helps. |
Feb. 17, 2010 DoubleL10 Men's 70 905 posts | Easy E, So what happened to Ken Lipinski? Is he coming back as Manager or did some of his guys just keep the team name? I've known Ken since 1996 and he, as far as I'm concerned, IS the Mavericks. |
Feb. 17, 2010 curveball Men's 65 705 posts | I'm hearing Ken will be feilding the team. They will have a couple of personel changes, but will be the good ol' Mavericks we all know. Perhaps one of their players will post and get us up to speed on their team for 2010. Double 10: I think Mike Adair posting thinking it was over, but then there was a change of heart.............. Also I assume you caught my typo, age group 50-58, not 30 to 58! |
Feb. 17, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | I certainly hope the Mavericks core group still will be playing whatever they will be called. They are an excellent team and a great challenge to compete with! |
Feb. 18, 2010 Tate22 Men's 60 280 posts | Jawood Don't worry, the Mavericks will be playing this year and are pretty much intact from last year. Some of the bigger names may play less, but they still exist and plan on playing regularly. Ken Lapinski is still very much involved. We, Nighthawks 55M+, get to play them twice this weekend in Temecula, CA. I agree with Jawaood that they are an excellent team, well managed with great guys, that challenges every opponent to play well and improve. Don Newhard |
Feb. 21, 2010 slugger54 1 posts | The Mavericks have a team. Ken Lipinski is involved.Mike Adair has not been on the Mavericks for the last 3 years. |
Feb. 22, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | Tate22 How did you guys do against the Mavericks last weekend? Are they called something else? They are not listed anymore in the ratings section anymore. If SSUSA insists on having a Major-plus division, they need teams! |
Feb. 22, 2010 Tate22 Men's 60 280 posts | Jawood: Unfortunately, the tournament got rained out. By Northwest standards, the rain we had wouldn't qualify as a mist, but the fields weren't playable. The Mavericks are still on the Ratings list, shown as the Seacrest Mavericks, as they have been for a few years. I know you are with me on combining M & M+. We are going to have the same issue all year with no 55 M+ teams to play and will likely get stuffed in with 50's teams again. No response from SSUSA staff on a survey of M & M+ teams to resolve this ongoing question. Take care: Don Newhard |
Feb. 22, 2010 Tate22 Men's 60 280 posts | BTW - Einstein wants slugger 54 to man up and identify himself!!! LOL |
Feb. 22, 2010 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | Add going blind to my growing list of things going wrong with my body! It was actually 60 and sunny up here last weekend, but we still haven't practiced yet. |