http://seniorsoftball.com/?page=12

 
SIGN IN:   Password     »Sign up

Message board   »Message Board home    »Sign-in or register to get started

Online now: 2 members: Heyboods34, jwo-9; 37 anonymous
Change topic:

Details for chico senior


Real name:

Location:
Chico, CA

Division:
Men's 60

Messages posted by chico senior »Message board home   »Start a new discussion

June 18, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Nor Cal / Can-Sirs Championships

Wow!!! This is a new question.
June 9, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Rules of the game
Discussion: Was The ump

B.J. - Having trouble following your post. What is OP? Also I donít understand the last part of your post. Sorry!
June 9, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Rules of the game
Discussion: Was The ump

Looks like Benyi4 owes someone an apology! B.J. Maybe 1st baseman did do something wrong.
May 5, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Get rid of the 1-1 count

How about Einstein?
April 25, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: The Screamer5

Well you guys running NCSSA, are you going to still claim there is no proof that playing with a 1-1 count doesnít speed up the game? If iím not mistaken between last years at Vegas and the SW Championships every single game that was played went 7 innings.
Feb. 22, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Ratings

Welcome to the world of SSUSA. In 2013, our team, North State Screenprint, were a good, not great, 55AAA team. We enjoyed getting away from NCSSA occasionally to play SSUSA big tournaments in the West. We always went to Reno so that we could play teams we would not normally play. We finished 5th in a 22 team bracket. We played way over our heads and finished 9-2. We did not reach a +5, averaged 1/3 home runs per game, and had not won any major tournaments. We got moved to Major and it has followed us to the 60ís. I have appealed the decision to SSUSA (George) 3 times and they never really explained our move up other then to say it was because of Reno. Oh, by the way, two of the teams did not get moved up that finished ahead of us. They evaluated us on one tournament, not the 3 that they claim they look at. Obviously, we had no power and still donít. In one game we scored 42 runs without hitting a home run. Sounds like a Major team right? What actually happened is that we had 17 runs through 6 innings, had a huge 7th, and then in the extra inning scored a bunch again. Can we sometimes play with the big boys - yes. Do we have a honest chance to win the tournament - no. I know, suck it up and take the challenge. I am all for that but my feeling is that if you have not reached the pre-determined criteria fo a move up you should not be moved until you win at that level or reach the levels decided by SSUSA and mainly George.
Jan. 29, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Tournaments
Discussion: 1 and 1 with courtesy foul new rule for younger guys

I donít understand OZ40. He wants to know what percentage would indicate a change to a 1-1 count would increase the likelihood of playing a 7 inning game. Jawood indicated that last season his team only played 7 innings 36% of the time. I did not keep track of how many games over the 18 years I have played senior softball but my guess that our numbers would be somewhere near 50%. Also, the 40ís at Vegas this past year the number was 100%. Oh yeah, thatís right, they played with a 1-1 count. Is that a large enough sample?
Jan. 24, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Tournaments
Discussion: 1 and 1 with courtesy foul new rule for younger guys

Polls are done all the time - city, county, state, etc. they never ever come close to polling everyone like OZ40 would like. They poll far fewer then 22.9% of the population. Those polls, for the most part, normally end up being pretty close to the actual outcomes. Again, for anyone to complain about the number polled, when you had the opportunity to vote, is bogus.
Jan. 24, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Bats
Discussion: What Became of 30+ Ounce Bats?

Funny story. I started playing senior softball in 2000. I brought out my 38 oz Bomb bat and after my first at bat the guy on deck picked it up and thought it was the weighted warm up bat. Had to go out and buy a new 30 oz Demarini the next day. Now I swing a 26 oz Dudley and might move down to a 25oz Adidas. Think how things has improved since then.
Jan. 24, 2018
chico senior
Topic: Tournaments
Discussion: 1 and 1 with courtesy foul new rule for younger guys

OZ40 - Why do you think that the results would be different if more or even all SSUSA members voted? Iíd bet that the numbers would be very close to what that were with only 23% responding. In my mind 23% is a pretty good cross section and you could assume from it that percentages would remain about the same with with more responsed.
Jan. 17, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Drum Roll...the Starting Count decision results.

Don - I disagree with you that it doesnít save time but that is not really important to me. I think the vast majority of players would like to play a 7 inning game. Obviously looking at what SSUSA did in Vegas in my mind proves that using 1-1 counts greatly improved the chances of playing 7 innings. In fact, every single game that was played in the 40ís went at least 7 innings. Iím just a little disappointed that NCSSA doesnít look a little bigger sample size to determine what affects all ages, not just the older groups.
Jan. 16, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Drum Roll...the Starting Count decision results.

Don - I understand what you are saying. I donít know why the younger managers are not showing up to the general meeting but I still feel they deserve to be heard. You said it yourself - the board is made up of guys over 65 and the managers that show up are of the same age so it is no wonder they are going to push for rule changes that are going to best benefit them. That is not to say though that the younger guys shouldnít also have a say. In my mind it just would not be that hard to poll all managers on rule changes. I felt like when I suggested we look into the change at the general meeting the response of ďWe have discussed this in the past and donít want it and there is no proof that a 1-1 count has not been proven to save any timeĒ was ridiculous. It has been proven multiple times that it does save time.
Jan. 16, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Drum Roll...the Starting Count decision results.

Don5 - You are correct - it was voted on by all the managers that attended the meeting. The problem was that I was probably the youngest manager at the meeting and I am 68. We certainly did not get a good cross section of all the teams in NCSSA, especially the younger teams. A simple email sent to all managers asking their options would, in my mind, have been much more accurate. I know - all they had to do was attend the meeting to vote. We could easily implement on a trial basis in groups 0-6 the 1-1 count. If there was a 65 or older team in a bracket at any given tournament give them the option for their games. Simple! No extra work. Seven inning games more likely. What are the negatives of trying it? Obviously, NCSSA follows very closely what SSUSA does - why not this?
Jan. 14, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Drum Roll...the Starting Count decision results.

Dave - I agree with you100%. I just wish the old guys running NCSSA would do what SSUSA did and poll the members. By the way, I am not a 40 year old, I am 68 and my entire point is to come up with ways to play as many innings as possible in the allotted time. Of all the things I mentioned above the easiest one to control is moving to a 1-1 count. It is my feeling that the majority of the NCSSA players (there is something like 100 teams) would welcome the change. Even if all of them did not agree they could do what SSUSA has done and at least try it with the young groups on a trial basis.

Jan. 14, 2018
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Drum Roll...the Starting Count decision results.

Things that would speed up the game:
A. Getting on and off field quicker
B. Fewer or no warm up pitches after 1st inning
C. No infield ball after 1st inning
D. Huntsman games courtesy runner rule
E. Catcher not letting balls get past them
F. Fewer errors and walks
G. On deck batters ready to hit
H. No throwing ball around infield after every out
I. Umpires ready to go each innng

All of the above and probably many others ideas would definitely help play more innings in the allotted time. But, as was proven at Vegas over a large number of games played n the 40 Division, the 1-1 count speeds up the game. To say otherwise is to have your head in the sand.

I just attended the NCSSA general meeting and the idea of the 1-1 count was proposed and was voted down because there is a small group of guys who run that organization that are unwilling to change and more likely it is because they play in the older divisions (70 and up) and it was proven in the SSUSA surveythat the older age groups are against most any change.

Also, CurtfromKy, you said you wanted to be contacted by email so that you could vote - they did contact you by email and you choose not to read your email and respond. Thatís on you - not SSUSA.


Dec. 14, 2017
chico senior
Topic: Tournaments
Discussion: 5 games

Duke - I also started playing in 2000 and I donít ever remember playing at least 6 games or ever playing more then 3 days. I could be wrong, but I donít think so. I know there is some thought being given to extending certain age groups to 4 days because of the size of the brackets.
Dec. 13, 2017
chico senior
Topic: Tournaments
Discussion: 5 games

As far as I know SSUSA only guarantees 5 games. I have never heard or played in a SSUSA event that you were guaranteed 6 games. My guess is that you are getting another association mixed up with SSUSA.
Oct. 22, 2017
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: Huntsman Results

The Hunstman games were limited to 110 team per week. There were not 350 teams. Also, this year for the most part, after seeding games teams were put into 4 team double eliminations brackets. Comparing that to 80 plus brackets at Vegas and I think there is a big difference. Good luck Dave with trying to improve on your current way of doing it. It gets a little old listening to the same people beef about something that for the most part they know nothing about.
Sept. 27, 2017
chico senior
Topic: General and miscellaneous
Discussion: change tie breakers.. lets hear your thoughts

I disagree. What you are proposing encourages teams to run up the scores on lesser opponents. The one constant that all managers strive for is playing good defense. That does in no way embarrass the other team. Doing it you wat encourages managers to keep their best players on the field to attempt to run it up.

Aug. 22, 2017
chico senior
Topic: Rules of the game
Discussion: Players with the same number on a team

Boombah - Again, what's the big deal. Did the other team attempt to gain an advantage? If not, quit whining and just play the game. Who cares? In fact, I just finished playing our last league game and I decided not to put any numbers on our jerseys. After a few games everybody thought it was a great idea.
Older messages »
Senior Softball-USA
Email: info@SeniorSoftball.com
Phone: (916) 326-5303
Fax: (916) 326-5304
9823 Old Winery Place, Suite 12
Sacramento, CA 95827
Senior Softball-USA is dedicated to informing and uniting the Senior Softball Players of America and the World. Senior Softball-USA sanctions tournaments and championships, registers players, writes the rulebook, publishes Senior Softball-USA News, hosts international softball tours and promotes Senior Softball throughout the world. More than 1.5 million men and women over 40 play Senior Softball in the United States today. »SSUSA History  »Privacy policy

Follow us on Facebook

Partners