Message board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 0 members ; 7 anonymousDiscussion: On TH's rule(s) explanation
Posted | Discussion |
Feb. 12 taits Men's 65 4548 posts | On TH's rule(s) explanation In all fairness to them, SSUSA, perhaps if we played by the 2009 rules as setup, for a bit, not necessarily the whole season as wanted, but for more than one at least, to really get a feel for 'is it working, as intended"? IE: More equalized competition and more teams per divisions now lacking them now. Feedback like we have given, I think is accurate, even before playing under them, but to be fair, I think we need to do some at least. I do think the whole season is not needed. Most teams will continue to attend the same ones unless other concerns inter fear. They have flip-flopped before, and admitted it, only time will tell if it will happen again. These thoughts, suggestions, complaints & everything else posted are ALL read. Something is going to give, but what? |
Feb. 14 Jawood Men's 50 943 posts | r They still haven't made any adjustment in the classifications, there are still not enough teams in the Major-plus to make going to a tournament worth while, unless they combine the two, which would be fine with me. The only way that something is going to give is if less money is made than they are used to. |