EmptyMessage board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 0 members ; 9 anonymousDetails for maf
Real name:
Location:
,
Division:
Messages posted by maf »Message board home »Start a new discussion
| June 14, 2006 maf | Topic: General and miscellaneous Discussion: Balls My senior league plays with 375/44 balls. I believe we use the Diamond brand. Most players think the ball has no carry. Although I assume that\'s the purpose of 375/44 balls, I\'m wondering if there is a ball with the same compression and core that does have some or more carry and durability than the one we currently use. Any help? mmaf in central oregon |
| June 14, 2006 maf | Topic: General and miscellaneous Discussion: Balls My senior league plays with 375/44 balls. I believe we use the Diamond brand. Most players think the ball has no carry. Although I assume that\'s the purpose of 375/44 balls, I\'m wondering if there is a ball with the same compression and core that does have some or more carry and durability than the one we currently use. Any help? mmaf in central oregon |
| March 30, 2006 maf | Topic: Bats Discussion: Bat tape, tapers, knobs, etc. Thanks for the SPA link. So the Easton cone, properly installed and taped over is copacetic, but a taped knob is not. But why? A taped grip provides comfort, but does it provide a clear advantage to the batter? It's not like doctoring a bat by increasing the end (swing) weight. If fact, it probably balances a bat more. I don't see how it would create a advantage nor cause a safety problem. So why the restrictions? |
| March 29, 2006 maf | Topic: Bats Discussion: Bat tape, tapers, knobs, etc. What is the current SS and/or ASA ruling on bat tape to create a taper, or the Easton taper sleeve, or knob cuff type products? Any info or opinions out there? |
