Message board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 4 members: TABLE SETTER 11, ace42850, dawg888, softball4b; 252 anonymousDetails for boz6158
Real name:
Location:
,
Division:
Message posted by boz6158 »Message board home »Start a new discussion
| Aug. 14, 2014 boz6158 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Western National Tournament? Or ?... I have to question the logic of SSUSA. An Eastern team playing in a Western National tournament? The Eastern team winning a Western National Tournament? As a spectator I was thrown back by seeing this occur. Ok, I believe that the Western National team that came in second, does end up getting the opportunity to represent the West in the East/West National Championship game in Vegas, that's cool. But, had the East stayed and played in the East this wouldn't be an issue. I was also surprised to see the Eastern team take home the West Trophy, along with those nice jackets. Something smells fishy about this. Hey Props to Pope for winning the tournament, but Pope is from the East, not West. Come on now, can someone explain how this could happen? What is the logic here? Was is about the money? I can't for the life of me figure this out. What about the Western teams that took loses to Pope and got sent home? How is it a Western National with Eastern team playing in it? Does this mean Western teams can head East and play In their Eastern National? Does this really make sense? I heard there were only 2 teams in the Eastern National, ok, so, Pope makes it 3 teams, win that and play against the West, as it stands now Pope can't even play in that championship game in Vegas, what a waste. Boz |
