EmptyMessage board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 1 member: Oly44; 15 anonymousDetails for cal50
Real name:
Dave
Location:
Highland, IL
Division:
Men's 50
Messages posted by cal50 »Message board home »Start a new discussion
| June 24, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Rules of the game Discussion: A few questions about a tourney I was in over the weekend. The tournament curtiss may be talking about is the Missouri Senior games. We have a 50 Caliber (50 major team) and a 50 Caliber + (55 major team). There were 3 (50 teams) and 3 (55 teams). The entire tournament was played as a round robin with each of the 6 teams playing 5 games. When the 50's played against the 55's the games did not count in the actual tournament standings but were played to make sure every team played 5 games. Is this the tournament you are talking about curtiss? |
| June 21, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Cal Cup & Western Nationals It is posted in the ratings that they are now major, not a rumor. I remember playing them years ago in the 40 & older tournaments but have not ran into them for over 10 years. Were always a good group of guys. |
| May 13, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: brickyard What happened? We were there but never heard anything about it. |
| May 1, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: GSC Bat approved for Senior Softball $239 which includes a 1 year warranty. |
| April 30, 2013 cal50 | Topic: General and miscellaneous Discussion: Public Forum VS Anonymity Gary19 had his information posted. I don't know of a less credible person. |
| April 29, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: GSC Bat approved for Senior Softball Congratulations to Steve McKinlay for having a vision and making it happen! Anybody who has ever had an idea and then tried to bring it to market will realize this huge accomplishment of Steve's. A senior bat with a year warranty, a huge sweet spot and hot is now in production soon be ready for sale. Made in the U.S.A. |
| April 26, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Brickyard Tournament Thanks titanhd. |
| April 26, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Brickyard Tournament thanks titanhd, I had looked at that and saw they were not on it. They usually play in that one and was asking if they were going to enter it yet. |
| April 26, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Brickyard Tournament OKI, are you playing in Indy? |
| April 15, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Website comments Discussion: Time to change the format of the board I use a program called lastpass keeps track of all of your passwords and gives you the option to login you in automatically for any site you wish. |
| April 10, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Tournaments Discussion: Brickyard in Indy 50 Caliber will be bringing a 50 major and 55 major team. |
| April 5, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: The "P413" is nearly ready Well then I complimented you. All kidding aside glad you spoke with Steve. |
| April 5, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: The "P413" is nearly ready softball4b states it pretty well. the wood, this comment you made I did think that it was odd for you to just 'happen to be in the area' when you toured the SC factory. is why I said what I did, perhaps I was wrong in what you meant when you put it that way. |
| April 5, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: The "P413" is nearly ready I re-read your posts in this thread. Sugar coat it as you wish, your insinuations are very obvious. |
| April 5, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Bats Discussion: The "P413" is nearly ready the wood, I am not sure what your motive is by calling surf88 a liar like you are. You may try to sugarcoat your words, but that is exactly what you are doing. People called me a liar on here as well when I told people that I have been to the factory, which I have. taits on the other hand is simply a chronic negative poster as evidenced in his many posts of reading things into something that isn't there on most other subjects he responds to. Both you and taits are well aware of the history/circumstances that lead to today with Steve. Yet in almost every post about this you bring up the complete history of the progression of the bat, although you both are very aware it has little to do with Steve and the current product. Everyone knows surf88 on here, ask yourself what he has to gain versus what he has to lose by talking about the bat. Why in the world do you think he would be talking about this unless he truly believed it was about to happen? I speak with Steve a couple of times a week and it appears to me that something pretty special is about to come out. Instead of sticking your neck out and calling people liars, wait a little while and see. If things would fall completely apart, I would be the first to say I am wrong, I would bet surf88 would do the same...to taits and the wood, will you? |
| April 2, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Rules of the game Discussion: You make the call Oh I know it is not a continuous double play. |
| April 2, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Rules of the game Discussion: You make the call I would think that you can have a double play. Fly ball to an infielder runner thinks it is going through, fielder who caught the ball tags him. Do not need to appeal, he is out for being tagged off of the base. Unless you would be saying that the tag is an appeal play. |
| April 2, 2013 cal50 | Topic: Rules of the game Discussion: You make the call This is also where the 4th out rule can happen. The catch is the 2nd out, the appeal to first base is the 3rd out. They could then appeal the runner at third to keep the run from scoring and if that runner is called out for leaving too soon, it is the 4th out of the inning. |
| March 21, 2013 cal50 | Topic: General and miscellaneous Discussion: Tired of breaking bats I can't answer that, don't know. I will give you honest answer of what I know in a couple of weeks. |
| March 21, 2013 cal50 | Topic: General and miscellaneous Discussion: Tired of breaking bats Today, no....please ask me that question in a couple of weeks, will see if I can have a better answer for you. |
