EmptyMessage board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 4 members: 2basehit, T-mon, scottflodin, skimac53; 29 anonymousDiscussion: What do 12 and 6 foot arcs really look like?
| Posted | Discussion |
| Sept. 7 Bruce M Men's 55 122 posts | Here is an attempt to demonstrate them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSLcVbcAZt8 |
| Sept. 7 DaveDowell Men's 70 4321 posts | The easiest visualization I mention to players is the height of the average man for 6' and the top edge of a standard basketball backboard for 12' ... Most folks "get it" in that context ... |
| Sept. 7 Bruce M Men's 55 122 posts | Yes, Dave, that is why I did the video on a basketball court. Hope it helps. :=) |
| Sept. 7 softball4b Men's 70 1248 posts | I don't know if I could hit off of you, but it would be fun. Good Stuff!! |
| Sept. 8 mck71 Men's 60 344 posts | Excellent video Bruce. When I get questioned (usually on higher pitches) I would look for a field rake, they are usually 6 ft, and then I simply walk out in between home and pitchers plate and place the rake on top of my head (I am a little under 6ft) so that then gives questioning players a decent point of reference. My guidance to anyone who asks is find a spot high and low and stay consistent, 1st inning through 7th inning. Mistakes will be made but try to be consistent is what most players are looking for in an umpire (and a little hustle when necessary :-) |
| Sept. 8 HSquared Men's 60 147 posts | Thanks Bruce. As a 6'-0" pitcher myself, it's easy to achieve the 6 ft arc (most anything above my head). But the perception from a batter perspective is, that from 60 ft, the pitch is a "fast pitch" meeting the 6ft height threshold . There is no way to achieve the "same pace" with the given 6ft vs 12ft (arc) geometry. In lies the big debate. Thanks again for the video, and good luck in LV. |
| Sept. 8 Ozone8 44 posts | Very helpful, thank you. |
| Sept. 8 lb16 Men's 60 196 posts | My rant on pitch arc. I have seen consistently in all senior sanctions. Pitcher throws pitch 8-10 inches over head height of an over 6' pitcher called illegal almost every time "flat". Next pitch 13-15' range hits mat no illegal "strike". All sanctions should go to 6-10' that way you don't have to constantly swing at 13' plus pitches a little over 10' or so would still be acceptable. I know it's underhand and all that but if it is being called correctly consistently something should be changed. JMO end of rant! |
| Sept. 10 Full Count 57 posts | I think it really only matters what the umpires interpretation is. Definitely different from ump to ump. All you can hope for is the same calls for each team. Hopefully the ump can give a verbal on illegal pitches, that will give time for the hitter to process. U-trip umps tend to have a lower strike zone. |
| Sept. 10 Parman Men's 65 40 posts | Going to 6-10 ft arc would eliminate nearly all of the barking at umpires about high pitches. Id like to see it adopted |
| Sept. 10 FOFO Men's 60 284 posts | THe tough part is the inconsistency of some officials. I don't really care how high or low it is within reason as long as they call the same pitche illegal on a consistent basis. I umpired NSA which is 6-10 for many years. I would hold my head level and if the ball disapperaed above the brim of my cap it was illegal. Was it 10 feet? Not sure but it was illegal every time. |
| Sept. 11 Mikelmart 152 posts | This 6-12 pitch falls under perception vs. reality. Every umpire/hitter will have their own interpretation. It's best that the umpire be as consistent as possible, establish his zone with the pitcher and call illegal pitches loud enough for the batter to hear. The high pitch is easier to call in time but the low pitch not as much and once again be as consistent as possible, |
| Sept. 13 SS11 60 posts | So Bruce, if it goes over the backboard, it went over 12', right? Since the top of the backboard is 12', if the ball is over that it is illegal. Correct? |
| Sept. 14 DaveDowell Men's 70 4321 posts | SS11 ... Probably not ... The "clamshell" style backboard Bruce was pitching over generally are not taller than 18" ... Bruce was skimming the ball over that one, which would be just a couple of inches under 12" ... Had he been at an outdoor court with rectangular "standard" backboards, the top edge would be very close to 12" ... |
| Sept. 14 SS11 60 posts | Dave - you are almost correct. But those style of backboards range from 33" tall on a small one to 36" tall (for that shape). The difference is the amount of metal under the rim. There is a minimum 28" above the rim to top of backboard on those style backboard bought by cities for playgrounds. (Known from past life). Those pitches were all 12'6" at bottom of ball or higher. For the sake of softball and 6'-12' is it the bottom or top of the ball that should be judged? |
| Sept. 14 Full Count 57 posts | Nice video Bruce. |
| Sept. 14 Dbax Men's 65 2101 posts | SS11. Nope. I asked the question on the post. He said the top of the board was measured at one foot 10 inches above the 10 foot rim. |
